Satt vs. Cronometer

Cronometer is regarded as the gold standard for micronutrients: verified data (NCCDB/USDA) and up to ~84 nutrients per entry. The barcode scan is free; AI photo logging sits in the "Gold" subscription, and an account is mandatory. A German interface has existed since late 2025.

Cronometer: Cronometer Software Inc. (Canada) · Website

SattCronometer
PriceFree - no subscription, no in-app purchases, no adsFree version + "Gold" subscription (approx. USD 59.99/year, per the vendor)
Account requiredNoYes (account, cloud sync)
AdsNoneYes, in the free version
Data storageOn the device (optional, your own iCloud)Cloud account
Barcode scanIncluded, freeYes, free
AI photo scanIncluded, freeYes - photo logging (Gold)
DatabaseOpen Food Facts (open data)Verified data (NCCDB, USDA and others)
PlatformsiPhone (iOS 17+)iOS, Android, Web
LanguageGerman & EnglishGerman interface (since late 2025; database mostly English)

Strengths of Cronometer

  • Unmatched micronutrient depth (up to ~84 nutrients per entry)
  • Verified, high-quality data sources instead of purely crowdsourced
  • Strong free version incl. free barcode scan

Where Satt is different

  • Satt is free and ad-free - Cronometer's free version shows ads
  • Satt needs no account and stores on-device
  • German-first incl. German product names; AI photo scan at no extra cost

Verdict: Satt or Cronometer?

Cronometer is the best choice if you want to dive deep into micronutrients and put data quality above all else. For simple, free calorie tracking in German, without an account and ads, Satt is a better fit.

Satt - coming soon on the App StoreAll features

Frequently asked questions

Do I need Cronometer's level of data detail?

If you specifically track micronutrients, Cronometer is excellent. For everyday calories and macros, Satt is enough - free, in German and without an account.

More comparisons